Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Sinja Kraus vs Tamara Zidansek Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Kraus vs Zidansek analysis and find out who is favored!
Sinja Kraus vs Tamara Zidansek Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Kraus 0 - 0 Zidansek
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Kraus has won 45.27% of points on his second serve, while Zidansek has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Kraus, in recent form, has won 57.37% of his opponent's second serve points, while Zidansek has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 37.51% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Kraus has saved 52.26% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Zidansek has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Kraus has won 50% of matches played (W/L 32/ 32), with Zidansek winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Kraus has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 65% (W/L 134/ 73), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 39% (W/L 21/ 33). Zidansek has their best career surface win % on , winning % (W/L / ), and worse career win % on , winning % (W/L / ).
- Player level: In the last year, Kraus has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 48.84% of matches (W/L 21/ 22), where as Zidansek has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Kraus has played against opponents with an average rank of 272.06 while Zidansek has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Kraus has won 60% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Zidansek has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Kraus has converted 46.35% of breakpoint opportunities, and Zidansek has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
N/A
Rank
High
22
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
26
Age
R
Plays
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
Form
0% (0-0)
Career Total W/L
0% (0-0)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Sinja Kraus | Tamara Zidansek |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 53% (17/15) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 51% (38/37) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 49% (331/338) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 53% (8/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 56% (9/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.17 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 56 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.3 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 97 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:30:38 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 233.38 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 58% (1189/2055) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 60% (717/1189) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 45% (392/866) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 46% (108/233) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 45% (916/2036) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 75% (3/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 50% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 52% (11/10) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 55% (17/31) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 60% (6/10) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 70% (7/10) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 87% (15/13) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 13% (15/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 24% (17/4) | 0% (0/0) |
Sinja Kraus Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 |
Stats 
Hailey Baptiste
Player
Sinja Kraus
57%
(
46 of
81)
1st Serve %
58%
(
54 of
93)
13
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
80%
(
37 of
46)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
27 of
54)
57%
(
20 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
30%
(
24 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
44 of
93)
101
Total Points Won
73
|
6-0 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sinja Kraus
Player
Elizabeth Mandlik
69%
(
75 of
108)
1st Serve %
65%
(
67 of
103)
5
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
6
55%
(
41 of
75)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
41 of
67)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
14 of
36)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
58%
(
7 of
12)
48%
(
52 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
48 of
103)
104
Total Points Won
107
|
7-6(6) 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tamara Zidansek
Player
Sinja Kraus
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve %
61%
(
36 of
59)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
31%
(
17 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
59)
66
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sinja Kraus
Player
Dalila Jakupovic
68%
(
60 of
88)
1st Serve %
59%
(
48 of
81)
0
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
6
52%
(
31 of
60)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
48%
(
42 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
40 of
81)
86
Total Points Won
83
|
0-6 6-0 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Veronika Erjavec
Player
Sinja Kraus
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve %
50%
(
21 of
42)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
48%
(
14 of
29)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
51%
(
22 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
45
Total Points Won
40
|
6-4 3-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sinja Kraus
Player
Antonia Schmidt
58%
(
39 of
67)
1st Serve %
61%
(
33 of
54)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
6
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
36%
(
10 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
40%
(
27 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
31 of
54)
71
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Varvara Lepchenko
Player
Sinja Kraus
73%
(
70 of
96)
1st Serve %
60%
(
48 of
80)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
56%
(
39 of
70)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
22 of
48)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
46%
(
44 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
41 of
80)
93
Total Points Won
83
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sinja Kraus
Player
Gabriela Andrea Knutson
59%
(
42 of
71)
1st Serve %
64%
(
47 of
74)
3
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
6
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
39%
(
28 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
37 of
74)
80
Total Points Won
65
|
7-6(7) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 2 | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Rubber 2 | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
view more
Tamara Zidansek Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Cori Gauff
Player
Tamara Zidansek
48%
(
30 of
62)
1st Serve %
55%
(
36 of
66)
2
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
4
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
47%
(
15 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
40%
(
25 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
34 of
66)
71
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tamara Zidansek
Player
Alison Van Uytvanck
56%
(
42 of
75)
1st Serve %
63%
(
55 of
87)
0
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
2
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
30 of
55)
42%
(
14 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
35%
(
6 of
17)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
44%
(
33 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
43 of
87)
85
Total Points Won
77
|
6-2 2-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tamara Zidansek
Player
Hailey Baptiste
63%
(
52 of
83)
1st Serve %
48%
(
41 of
86)
1
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
4
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
27 of
41)
42%
(
13 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
20 of
45)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
42%
(
35 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
39 of
86)
87
Total Points Won
82
|
7-5 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Tamara Zidansek
Player
Noma Akugue Noha
61%
(
57 of
93)
1st Serve %
79%
(
75 of
95)
1
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
3
54%
(
31 of
57)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
34 of
75)
44%
(
16 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
56%
(
9 of
16)
Break Points Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
49%
(
46 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
51 of
95)
98
Total Points Won
90
|
4-6 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Tamara Zidansek
Player
Polona Hercog
66%
(
38 of
58)
1st Serve %
55%
(
36 of
65)
0
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
82%
(
31 of
38)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
31%
(
18 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
65)
69
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Julie Struplova
Player
Tamara Zidansek
76%
(
94 of
123)
1st Serve %
58%
(
61 of
106)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
55%
(
52 of
94)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
27 of
61)
34%
(
10 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
56%
(
10 of
18)
Break Points Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
50%
(
61 of
123)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
57 of
106)
119
Total Points Won
110
|
6-4 6-7(5) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tamara Zidansek
Player
Sinja Kraus
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve %
61%
(
36 of
59)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
31%
(
17 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
59)
66
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tamara Zidansek
Player
Cristina Dinu
59%
(
26 of
44)
1st Serve %
52%
(
32 of
61)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
77%
(
20 of
26)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
13 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
30 of
61)
61
Total Points Won
44
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nastasja Mariana Schunk
Player
Tamara Zidansek
64%
(
49 of
77)
1st Serve %
53%
(
48 of
91)
2
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
3
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
21 of
43)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
35%
(
27 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
41 of
91)
91
Total Points Won
77
|
6-2 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Hailey Baptiste
Player
Tamara Zidansek
50%
(
54 of
108)
1st Serve %
64%
(
48 of
75)
5
Aces
0
13
Double Faults
7
76%
(
41 of
54)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
32 of
48)
46%
(
25 of
54)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
39%
(
42 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
31 of
75)
97
Total Points Won
86
|
6-2 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Kraus Vs Zidansek Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
